“Men are evil...”
... and responsible for everything bad in the world that happens. Well, at least that’s what women will tell you, & have been as part of their little 'women's & gender studies' courses in college since the beginning of feminism. This debate has been raging for decades and is the cause of A LOT of confusion.
http://aremenevil.blogspot.com/
National Post Editorial Board: Larry Summers gets his revenge on Harvard
Posted: July 30, 2008, 1:06 PM by Kelly McParland
( http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/200... )
One way or another, you probably caught the news last week that girls have caught up with boys in average scores on standardized math tests in the United States, a result that was hailed as representing the closing of a long-standing “gender gap” that scientists have struggled to explain for decades. A Reuters story quoted the lead author of a study in Science magazine, Janet Hyde, as saying that “there aren’t gender differences anymore in math performance” that could account for the pre-eminence of men in strongly quantitative careers such as math and physics.
In the United States, the controversy over the potential for innate cognitive differences between the sexes has been much more prominent, thanks to incendiary remarks made in 2005 by the distinguished economist Lawrence Summers, then president of Harvard University. Mr. Summers, giving a talk on diversity in the academic workplace, suggested that in some fields such differences might permanently thwart the search for perfect gender balance. He was eventually forced out of his job early thanks to the many enemies these comments earned him. In its story on the study by Ms. Hyde et al., the Los Angeles Times took the opportunity to gloat that the results “undermined the assumption — infamously espoused by [Mr. Summers] — that boys are more likely than girls to be math geniuses.”
Unfortunately, journalists of both sexes tend to not be math geniuses. Few of them anywhere on the continent noticed that Ms. Hyde’s data actually come a lot closer to supporting Mr. Summers’ hypothesis than they do to refuting it.
IQ